What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
Blog Article
refers to your landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. In this article’s a brief overview:
Due to recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been doable under the previous Variation from the legislation.
Life imprisonment is undoubtedly an alternative towards the death penalty. In this sort of cases, the convicted person is sentenced to invest the remainder of their natural life behind bars.
Deterrence: The anxiety of severe outcomes, together with capital punishment, is meant to prevent likely criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is critical in reducing the incidence of intentional killings.
Because of their position between the two main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of law.
The recent amendment to Section 489-F with the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the regulation with contemporary challenges.
The ruling of your first court created case law that must be followed by other courts right up until or Except either new law is created, or possibly a higher court rules differently.
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
Section 302 with the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject to the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been from the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally sound, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are issue to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion could be regarded as, however, we're apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, topic to availability of vacancy subject for the approval with the competent authority.
this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion of the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is perfectly recognized now that the provision for proforma promotion is just not alien or unfamiliar for the civil servant service structure but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his personal, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to your Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that this sort of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of spend and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, here within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.